For UK financial advisers only. Not approved for use by customers. Visit the Prudential customer website For UK financial advisers only. Not approved for use by customers. Visit the Prudential customer website

Taxation of offshore policies: the facts

Author Image The Technical Team
21 minutes read
Last updated on 6th Apr 2018

Overview

Find out how offshore life assurance bonds are taxed in the hands of individuals and trustees.

Key points

  • Offshore bonds grow in a virtually tax-free environment which is known as gross roll-up.
  • Individuals can offset the basic rate gain against any unused personal allowance, the starting rate of 0% and the personal savings rate if applicable.

  • Individuals may be able to make use of top slicing to reduce the tax payable on the gain.

What are offshore bonds?

Offshore bonds and protection products are 'foreign policies of life insurance and foreign capital redemption policies' for UK tax purposes (Section 476 of the Income Tax (Trading & other Income) Act 2005). From 17 November 1983, a policy issued by a non-UK life office will be 'non-qualifying' for tax purposes, meaning all gains are potentially taxable. Similarly, UK investment bonds are also non-qualifying. Indeed, the same tax legislation determines the tax treatment of these respective policies. Accordingly, the principles covered in the Taxation of UK Investment Bonds article hold good for offshore policies but certain special rules apply.

In this section we will consider how offshore policies are taxed for individuals, personal representatives and trustees.

Taxation of individuals

Individuals liable for tax on a gain on a UK bond are treated as having paid tax on the gain at basic rate (currently 20%). The reason for this is that the underlying fund is taxed. As a result, tax is only payable by those individuals with a marginal rate of 40% or 45%.

In contrast, offshore policies can be issued by life companies based in jurisdictions which impose no tax on the income and gains of the underlying funds – this is known as 'gross roll-up'. Growth may not be entirely tax-free however, due to the impact of irrecoverable withholding tax which may be deducted from interest and dividends received by the fund.

When an offshore policy is surrendered an individual can be charged income tax at nil if the personal allowance is available; starting rate 0%; basic rate 20%, higher rate 40% and additional rate 45%. If you need to make higher rate and additional rate calculations, see our article Top slicing relief. Top slicing relief is available for the higher rate and additional rate calculations.

Effective from 6 April 2016, a new personal savings allowance has been introduced. Each individual will have an annual savings allowance of £1,000 unless he/she has any higher rate income for the year (in which case the allowance will be £500) or any additional rate income (in which case the allowance will be nil). ‘Savings income’ includes gains on offshore bonds.

Example: Taxation of an individual

In 2018/19, Helen who is 50 years old and has zero income realises a chargeable event gain of £19,000 on the full surrender of an offshore bond. Tax payable would be as follows:

£11,850

@Nil

£0

£5,000

@0%

£0

£1,000

@0%

£0

£1,150

@20%

£230

£19,000

 

£230

To put this into context, if Helen realised the same gain on an onshore bond then she would have had no personal income tax liability based on these figures since the gain is comfortably within the basic rate limit. 

So in very broad terms:

  • Basic rate taxpayers are subject to 20% tax on the gain
  • Higher rate taxpayers are subject to 40% tax on the gain
  • Additional rate taxpayers are subject to 45% tax on the gain.

It’s not as simple as that however, since gains are generally treated as forming the highest slice of income. A basic rate taxpayer can therefore be pushed into higher rate, or a higher rate taxpayer can be pushed into additional rate. 'Top slicing' relief may therefore assist in reducing the rate of tax charged by applying a spreading mechanism.

Chargeable event gains (without top slicing) are included in an individual's income when assessing entitlement to personal allowances Personal Allowances planning article. Withdrawals within 5% limits do not affect personal allowance entitlement.

Taxation of personal representatives

Personal representatives pay income tax at basic rate (and 7.5% for dividend income). When income arising during the administration period is distributed to a beneficiary, then the beneficiary will include the gross equivalent in his/her tax return. The personal representatives will provide the beneficiary with a statement, showing the amount of estate income paid to that beneficiary and the amount of tax deemed to have been paid on that income.

In the case of a bond, the personal representatives might encash where the beneficial owner has died but the bond has continued due to the existence of another life assured. Any chargeable event gain arising on the continuing policy is treated as income of the estate and the personal representatives will be liable to tax on that gain. With an offshore bond, gains are charged at basic rate in the hands of the personal representatives.

When the proceeds are later distributed to the beneficiary, the chargeable event gain will be taxable on the beneficiary as normal, who will be treated as having paid tax on the gain at 20% basic rate and who will be able to utilise top slicing where appropriate.

Taxation of trustees

The circumstances when trustees are taxable are considered in the Taxation of UK Bonds article. Where trustees are taxable, and it is an offshore policy, then:

  • For discretionary trusts, basic rate applies on gains up to £1,000, where this hasn't already been set against other non-savings income, otherwise
  • The rate applicable to trusts applies (45%).

Example: The trustees of the MacPherson Discretionary Will Trust

In 2018/19, the trustees of the MacPherson will trust surrender an offshore bond purchased in 2008 and realise a gain of £50,000. This is the sole investment of the trust. Tax payable would be as follows:

£1,000

@20% =

£200

£49,000

@45% =

£22,050

£50,000

 

£22,250

So a gain of up to £1,000 could result in just a 20% tax charge for an offshore policy. Top slicing relief can’t be used for this purpose.

In view of the 45% rate of tax which applies, planning opportunities arise for trustees to consider an assignment of the bond or of specific segments to beneficiaries prior to encashment. This is covered in the Tax Planning with UK Investment Bonds article.

Top slicing relief

This is covered in detail in our Top Slicing Relief article.

No top slicing relief is available for the annual gains that arise on 'personal portfolio bond events' (see later section).

Time apportionment relief

This now also applies to policies issued by UK insurers on or after 6 April 2013 and to existing policies issued by UK insurers, which are modified on or after that date.

The chargeable gain for an offshore policy is reduced for tax purposes if the beneficial owner was not UK resident throughout the policy period. The reduction does not apply where the policy is or was held by a non-UK resident trustee (S528 ITTOIA 2005).

The chargeable event gain is reduced by an appropriate fraction equal to A/B

  • A - the number of days on which the beneficial owner was not UK resident in the policy period.
  • B - the number of days in that period.

Accordingly, if the beneficial owner was non-UK resident for the whole period then the chargeable gain will be nil.

Please see the Tax Planning with Offshore Policies article for more information.

Budget 2012 originally announced a consultation exercise on 'reforming' the time apportionment rules. As a result, changes effective from 6 April 2013 are:

  • The relief will be available in the majority of cases to the person liable to tax in respect of the chargeable event gain. Previously the reduction was based on the residence history of the policyholder (the legal owner) rather than the beneficial owner.
  • Where there are joint beneficial owners then the calculation of relief is based on each individual's residence history applied to their share of the gain.
  • Where there are previous owners, only the residence history of the person liable is to be taken into account.
  • Under the statutory residence rules there is an anti-avoidance rule, under which chargeable event gains arising during a period of temporary non-residence will be treated as income arising in the year of return to the UK. Time apportionment relief and top slicing relief will be available in this situation.

Personal portfolio bonds (PPBs)

The chargeable event regime enables individual investors to postpone tax on underlying economic gains until the policy comes to an end.

The personal portfolio bond (PPB) rules provide a stricter regime where the property that determines the benefits under the policy is personal to the investor in a way that goes beyond the usual choices offered. One example of this is a bond where benefits are determined by reference to shares in the policyholder's private trading company, which he has transferred to the insurer.

The PPB regime is therefore an anti-avoidance measure founded on the principle of an annual charge. The rules apply to a policy that is a PPB at the end of an 'insurance year', unless it is the 'final insurance year'. The calculation made to determine whether a gain arises and, if so, its amount is in addition to any other calculation required under the chargeable event regime.

An insurance year begins on the day a policy is taken out and on the same date in subsequent years. It ends on the day before the anniversary of the start date and each subsequent year.

Example: personal portfolio bond penalties

A policy taken out on 3 June 2012 will have an insurance year ending on 2 June 2013. The second insurance year begins on ends on 3 June 2013 and ends on 2 June 2014 (and so on).

Where a policy is a PPB at the end of the insurance year, there is a PPB gain if the sum of premiums paid and total amount of earlier PPB excesses exceeds the total amount of part surrender gains. The PPB gain is equal to 15% of the excess. This calculation is not performed for the final insurance year.

The penal effect of this legislation can be illustrated with a simple example.

Sam is a UK resident 40% taxpayer who invests £100,000 in a bond caught by the PPB rules and fully encashes it after 5 years for £140,000.

Insurance year 1 gain : £100,000x15% = £15,000 (tax due £6,000)

Insurance year 2 gain: (£100,000+£15,000)x15% = £17,250 (tax due £6,900)

Insurance year 3 gain: (£100,000+£15,000+£17,250)x15% = £19,838 (tax due £7,935)

Insurance year 4 gain: (£100,000+£15,000+£17,250+£19,838)x15% = £22,813 (tax due £9,125)

Insurance year 5 gain: (£100,000+£15,000+£17,250+£19,838+£22,813)x15% = £26,235 (tax due £10,494)

Encashment:

£

Proceeds

140,000

Less Premium

(100,000)

Less total PPB gains

(101,136)

Deficiency

(61,136)

 

Sam would get no relief for this deficiency since he incurred no previous chargeable event gains on part surrender or part assignment. Accordingly he will have paid total tax of £40,454 on an economic bond gain of £40,000. 

The PPB legislation (S516 ITTOIA 2005) only applies to policies where:

  • Some or all of the benefits are determined by reference in some way to an index or property of any description, and
  • Some or all of that property or the index may be selected by the policyholder, or somebody connected with the policyholder or acting on their behalf.

Except where the terms of the policy only permit the selection of certain narrowly defined property or indices. In particular a policy is not a PPB if all of the property, which may be selected falls within the following categories (S520 ITTOIA 2005).

  1. An internal linked fund of the insurer
  2. Units in an authorised unit trust
  3. Shares in an approved investment trust
  4. Shares in an open-ended investment company (OEIC)
  5. Cash (but not acquired for speculative purposes)
  6. A life policy, life annuity or capital redemption policy (unless itself linked to a PPB)
  7. An interest in a collective investment scheme constituted by:
  • A company which is non-UK resident (other than an OEIC)
  • A unit trust scheme the trustees of which are non-UK resident
  • Any other non-UK arrangements which create co-ownership rights.

In addition the opportunity to select must broadly be available to other policyholders.

It is important to note that a critical factor in determining whether a policy is a PPB is the scope of a policyholder's ability to select a property or index under the terms of the policy, rather than what in practice is selected. Where the policyholder genuinely does not have the ability to select property or an index, even if that property or index is not within any of the permitted categories, the policy will not be a PPB, although the presence of personal assets would test this analysis.

Legislation was introduced in Finance Bill 2017 to add new subsections to Section 520 of Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005. This provides a power to update the table contained in Section 520 (2) of Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005, in secondary legislation. Regulations to remove a property category will be subject to the affirmative procedure, whilst additions will be subject to the negative procedure.

Regulations have been published adding UK real estate investment trusts, overseas equivalents of investment trust companies and authorised contractual schemes to the table, and removing category 7a. An interest in a collective investment scheme constituted by a company resident outside the UK, other than an open-ended investment company.

Top-slicing relief is not available on gains on PPB events and therefore insurers must always report the number of years as 1 on chargeable event certificates (see later section).

Overseas tax issues

Where an overseas life company issues a policy to a UK investor who subsequently relocates to that same country, then tax implications can potentially arise. For example the company may then be obliged to deduct tax from the policy and pay it to the host tax authorities in recognition that the policyholder then resides in that territory. In addition, if the overseas jurisdiction has a system which taxes gifts, acquisitions or estates then the policy might fall within that regime in certain situations. Exemptions and reliefs might apply but each investment would need to be considered on a case by case basis.

Chargeable event certificates

Overseas insurers fall within the scope of the chargeable event reporting rules where a minimum level of business is conducted with UK residents. Accordingly, in most circumstances, information about chargeable events must be provided to policyholders and HMRC in broadly similar fashion to that provided by UK insurers.

Where the level of business with UK residents of an overseas insurer exceeds a £1 million threshold, it is required to have a person in the UK acting as its tax representative unless it is released by HMRC from this requirement where certain conditions are met. For example the insurer may supply the information directly.

The main duties of a tax representative are to provide information about chargeable events and gains to policyholders and HMRC.

Policyholder resident in the UK?

An insurer is not required to take active steps to establish whether an individual policyholder is resident in the UK – that is a matter for HMRC. The insurer must act according to the residence status that is indicated by the information in its possession.

An insurer does not need to ask policyholders for information that it doesn’t need for business reasons, or take active steps to determine where policyholders are resident. It should however act upon any relevant information that it receives.

If the insurer has a live correspondence address for the policyholder then it should treat the policyholder as resident in the country, unless it has other information indicating that the policyholder is actually resident in another country. If the insurer has reason to believe that the address is not where the policyholder lives, but has no information about the policyholder's place of residence, then there is no requirement for the insurer to establish the place of residence unless it chooses to do so for its own purposes.

There may be circumstances in which the insurer has no information about where a policyholder lives at the time of the event either directly from the policyholder or via an intermediary. In the absence of any contrary evidence, an insurer should assume that the policyholder is resident in the UK if:

  • It receives a request to pay the policy benefits to an address in the UK
  • It receives a request to pay policy benefits on maturity or surrender directly to a UK bank or building society account, or
  • A new policy is sold through a UK-based intermediary and the insurer has not received any notification of an overseas address either at the time of the sale or subsequently.

Information to be provided to UK resident policyholders

The information that must be reported to policyholders and the circumstances in which it must be supplied are similar to that for UK insurers. Please see the Taxation of UK Bonds article for more information including time limits.

The following two aspects relate only to offshore policies:

  • Whether income tax is treated as paid on a gain from the policy
  • Number of years for top-slicing relief purposes

Whether income tax is treated as paid on a gain from the policy

The tax representative is required to report whether income tax would be treated as paid, and if so the amount of the tax.

In practice however, where the policy is from an overseas insurer it will almost always be the case that no income tax is treated as paid on the gain. The main exception is where the policy was taken out before 18 November 1983 and has not been varied since then to increase the benefits secured or extend the term.

Number of years for top-slicing relief purposes

A tax representative is required to calculate and report the full number of years for top-slicing relief. Where a policyholder was not resident in the UK for part of the policy period, the number of years is reduced to reflect this but the tax representative must not report the reduced number, even if it has the information to calculate it. The self-assessment tax return guidance also tells a policyholder how to work out this reduced number.

Information to be provided to HMRC

A tax representative is also required to provide information to HMRC:

  • On chargeable events other than whole assignments if the gain, aggregated with any connected gains exceeds half the 'basic rate limit' for the tax year in which the gain arises, and
  • On all whole assignments for money or money's worth, regardless of the size of the gain.

For the tax year ended 5 April 2019, half the basic rate limit is £17,250.

A gain is connected with another gain if they both arise on chargeable events in the same tax year on policies with the same overseas insurer where there is at least one common policyholder.

Even where the gain is below the basic rate limit, HMRC may require a tax representative to supply a copy of the chargeable event certificate that it was required to send to the policyholder. In practice, HMRC is not likely to invoke this power frequently since in enquiry cases the taxpayer will be the first person from whom HMRC will seek to obtain evidence in support of entries in the tax return.

The time limit for a tax representative to send a certificate to HMRC is the same as for a UK insurer. Please see the Taxation of UK Bonds article.

Supply of information directly by overseas insurer

As noted above, an overseas insurer may supply information about chargeable events to policyholders and HMRC directly, rather than through a tax representative. The information required depends on when the policy was made.

  • If the policy was made after 5 April 2000 then the information to be provided is largely the same as for UK bonds, the main difference being that gains on assignments should be reported.
  • If the policy was made before 6 April 2000 then the information that the insurer must provide is more limited.

A chargeable event for pre-6 April 2000 policies is reportable if it is a last event (ie if it brings the policy to an end). This will be on the maturity or full surrender of the policy, or on the death of an individual giving rise to benefits under the policy. The 'last event' is only reportable where the total of benefits paid:

  • on the event, and
  • on any other 'last events' in the same tax year on policies with the same insurer where at least one of the policyholders is the same…

…exceeds twice the basic rate limit (2 x £34,500) = £69,000 for 2018/19), unless the overseas insurer is satisfied that no gain arises.

If the 'last event' is a death, the insurer must report where the death benefit exceeds twice the basic rate limit. It must not substitute the surrender value immediately before death, even though for life policies that figure is used in the chargeable event gain calculation.

It is usually clear when a policy was made. However, where a policy is altered after 5 April 2000 in such a way that goes to the root of the policy it will bring into existence a new policy, which will then fall within the reporting rules for policies made after 5 April 2000. An example of such a change would be a change of life assured.

The insurer does not have to report information about a chargeable event on a pre-6 April 2000 policy to the policyholder. However, the insurer may send the policyholder a copy.

For post 5 April 2000 policies, an overseas insurer must provide a certificate to a policyholder within three months of the chargeable event. However, an insurer might not find about an assignment or death until sometime after the event. Accordingly, it is acceptable to issue the chargeable event certificate to the policyholder within three months of being notified of the event. Certificates should be sent to HMRC within three months of the end of the tax year in which the certificate for the policyholder was sent.

Currency in which gains and other information may be reported

Some policies may be denominated in a currency other than sterling. UK resident policyholders have to enter the gains in sterling in their tax returns. If chargeable event certificates are not expressed in sterling the method of currency translation to be used is described below.

Reporting thresholds

In many cases the tax representative or insurer will need to calculate the chargeable event gain or policy proceeds in sterling to check whether it needs to report the event to HMRC because the reporting thresholds are linked to the basic rate limit, which is denominated in sterling. Currency conversion should be at the rate applying on the date of the event.

Calculation of gains and other amounts for policies in foreign currencies

Where a tax representative or insurer reports a gain in sterling, it should compute the gain by calculating the amount of the chargeable event gain in the currency in which the policy is denominated and then convert it into sterling at the conversion rate on the date of the event. This ensures that currency fluctuations during the life of the policy are disregarded.

Where a tax representative or insurer reports other amounts in sterling, for instance the premiums paid where there has been an assignment, they should be translated at the rate applying on the date of the chargeable event.

Reporting duties where the policy is held on trust

Where a policy is held in trust, the trustees would in most cases be the policyholder. A trust is a single continuing body for tax purposes and so the trustees are treated as a single policyholder.

Where an overseas insurer or tax representative must send a chargeable event certificate or information notice to HMRC, it should enter on the certificate or notice the name and address of the trustee that has been designated to receive correspondence. If there is no such designated trustee then the insurer should include the names and addresses of all the trustees.

Where it must send a chargeable event certificate to the policyholder, it should send a certificate to the first named trustee, or to any trustee for which it holds an address.

Whether trustees are UK resident

Insurers and tax representatives are only required to report events on 'relevant insurances'. A policy will only be a relevant insurance if the policyholder is resident in the UK so where the policyholders are trustees it is necessary to know whether the trustees, when regarded as a single body, should be treated as UK resident.

If all or none of the trustees are resident in the UK then the trustees must be treated as UK resident or not as appropriate. But where the residence of the trustees is mixed, some UK resident and some not, the position is less straightforward.

Then the trustees are treated as UK resident if the settlor of the trust was resident or ordinarily resident or domiciled in the UK when he or she created the trust or provided funds for it. This is not necessarily information that an insurer or tax representative will hold and it is not expected to take steps to obtain it. An insurer should act on the basis of information in its possession. Where it knows that at least one of the trustees is UK resident, it should treat the trustees as being UK resident, unless it has information to suggest otherwise, and report events on the policy to the trustees and HMRC where required.

Chargeable person

Either the trustees or the settlor may be chargeable on any gains arising on the policy. However, in operating the chargeable event reporting rules an overseas insurer or tax representative does not need to know who the liable person is, since the rules only require that information is provided about, and to, policyholders. Insurers do not need to establish the identities of the beneficiaries or settlors of the trust.

Labelled Under:
Investment bonds Tax

© Prudential 2018